MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988919151 · doi:10.1115/1.4027491

Comprehensive Online Control Strategies for Plastic Injection Molding Process

2014· article· en· W1988919151 on OpenAlexaff
Jaho Seo, Amir Khajepour, Jan P. Huissoon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeed forwardPID controllerTemperature controlProcess (computing)Controller (irrigation)Molding (decorative)Finite element methodComputer scienceInjection molding machineAdaptive controlControl theory (sociology)MoldControl engineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Composite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes an effective thermal control for plastic injection molding (polymer: Santoprene 8211-45 with density of 790 kg/m3, injection pressure: 1400 psi (9,652,660 Pa)) in a laminated die. For this purpose, a comprehensive control strategy is provided to cover various themes. First, a new method for determining the optimal sensor locations as a prerequisite step for modeling and controller design is introduced. Second, system identification through offline and online training with finite element analysis and neural network techniques are used to develop an accurate model by incorporating uncertain dynamics of the laminated die. Third, an additive feedforward control by adding direct adaptive inverse control to self-adaptive PID is developed for temperature control of cavity wall (cavity size: 52.9 × 32.07 × 16.03 mm). A verification of designed controller's performance demonstrates that the proposed strategy provides accurate online temperature tracking and faster response under thermal dynamics with various cycle-times in the injection mold process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringSame topicInjection Molding Process and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207