MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intermetallic phases observed in non-modified and Sr modified Al–Si cast alloys containing mischmetal

2013· article· en· W1988935193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cast Metals Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIntermetallicMischmetalMaterials scienceAlloyEutectic systemMetallurgyElectron microprobePhase (matter)Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An extensive study was carried out to investigate the types of intermetallic phases observed in non-modified and Sr modified A319·1, A356·2 and A413·1 alloys with 0, 2, 4 and 6 wt-% mischmetal (MM) additions and solidified under high and low cooling rate conditions. Quantification of the intermetallics was carried out using electron probe microanalysis and revealed that the total surface fraction of intermetallic phases increased with the addition of MM to the alloys. Wavelength dispersion spectroscopic analysis was employed to identify these phases. In addition to the Al2Cu phase in A319·1 alloy, the Mg2Si phase in A356·2 alloy and the platelet-like β-Al5FeSi and α-Al15(MnFe)3Si2 and α-Al15(MnFeNiCu)3Si2 Chinese script-like iron intermetallic phases in the A413·1 alloy, various MM containing intermetallic phases were observed at high and low cooling rates, each exhibiting a specific Ce/La ratio and morphology. Many of these MM containing intermetallic phases were found to contain Sr, which confirmed the interaction of MM with Sr. Thus, the effectiveness of Sr as a modifier of the eutectic Si phase in these alloys would be reduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it