Intermetallic phases observed in non-modified and Sr modified Al–Si cast alloys containing mischmetal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An extensive study was carried out to investigate the types of intermetallic phases observed in non-modified and Sr modified A319·1, A356·2 and A413·1 alloys with 0, 2, 4 and 6 wt-% mischmetal (MM) additions and solidified under high and low cooling rate conditions. Quantification of the intermetallics was carried out using electron probe microanalysis and revealed that the total surface fraction of intermetallic phases increased with the addition of MM to the alloys. Wavelength dispersion spectroscopic analysis was employed to identify these phases. In addition to the Al2Cu phase in A319·1 alloy, the Mg2Si phase in A356·2 alloy and the platelet-like β-Al5FeSi and α-Al15(MnFe)3Si2 and α-Al15(MnFeNiCu)3Si2 Chinese script-like iron intermetallic phases in the A413·1 alloy, various MM containing intermetallic phases were observed at high and low cooling rates, each exhibiting a specific Ce/La ratio and morphology. Many of these MM containing intermetallic phases were found to contain Sr, which confirmed the interaction of MM with Sr. Thus, the effectiveness of Sr as a modifier of the eutectic Si phase in these alloys would be reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".