Efficacy of Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft and Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Posterolateral Fusion of Lumbar Spine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Meta analysis of randomized control trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the radiographic and clinical effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) within the context of posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine (LS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various bone graft substitutes have been used in the setting of posterolateral lumbar fusions. Recently, great interest has been shown in BMPs. Clinical trials have tested the efficacy of BMPs to iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in posterolateral fusion procedures of the LS. A cumulative result of these studies would give more credit to the final conclusions. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases, and references from eligible articles was conducted. Comparative studies reporting on the results of posterolateral fusion for treatment of degenerative disease of LS and including 2 treatment groups either ICBG (control group) or BMP (experimental group) for achievement of fusion were regarded eligible. A pooled estimate of effect size was produced using both random and fixed effect model. RESULTS: Seven randomized control trials (n = 331 patients) and 1 prospective comparative study (n = 52 patients) were included in the present study. BMPs appeared more efficacious to ICBG in achieving solid fusion [relative risk (RR) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28-0.61, P < 0.00001], but with significant heterogeneity (I = 42.5%). rBMP-2 was more efficacious to ICBG in promoting fusion (RR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.18-0.47, P < 0.00001), whereas rhBMP-7 (osteogenic protein-1) appeared equivalent to ICBG in that respect (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.54-2.54, P = 0.70). Patients treated with BMPs had a shorter hospitalization (by 1.03 days, 95% CI = 0.61-1.45 days) compared with those that were treated with ICBG. BMPs appeared more efficient in instrumented than noninstrumented posterolateral fusions. CONCLUSION: Although the radiographic results appeared better in the group of BMPs, the exact role of type, dose and carrier of BMPs and the cost-effectiveness of their use need further clinical delineation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.024 | 0.045 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".