MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988942363 · doi:10.1179/026708304x4321

TEM study of nanopores and the embrittlement of CVD nickel foam

2004· article· en· W1988942363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal and Thin Film Mechanics
Canadian institutionsFibics (Canada)Natural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoporeNickelEmbrittlementAnnealing (glass)BrittlenessComposite materialSinteringHardening (computing)Ductility (Earth science)MetallurgyNanotechnologyCreep

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ni foam, manufactured by depositing Ni onto polyurethane foam using the carbonyl CVD process, exhibits brittleness which has been correlated with the presence of a high number-density of ‘nanopores’. These nanopores, which were typically less than ∼25 nm in diameter, tended to be associated with sulphur, which is present in the form of H 2 S as a catalyst during the deposition process. The as deposited foam also shows significant hardening, ascribed to the high density of nanopores. This hardening may also help to reduce the ductility compared to well annealed nickel foam. High temperature annealing restores the foam to the high ductility typical of high purity nickel by coarsening the nanopores and removing the sulphur. The failure of the pores to sinter during high temperature annealing indicates the presence of stable gas molecules, the pressure from which balances the surface tension forces that drive sintering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it