MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988954612 · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.063403

Resonant electric dipole-dipole interactions between cold Rydberg atoms in a magnetic field

2006· article· en· W1988954612 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Afrousheh, Parisa Bohlouli-Zanjani, J. D. Carter, A. Mugford, J. D. D. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAtomic physicsRydberg formulaPhysicsRydberg atomExcited stateRydberg stateDipoleElectric dipole transitionElectric fieldLaser linewidthMagnetic fieldRydberg matterMicrowaveField (mathematics)Magnetic dipoleLaserIonizationIonOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser-cooled $^{85}\mathrm{Rb}$ atoms were optically excited to $46{d}_{5∕2}$ Rydberg states. A microwave pulse transferred a fraction of the atoms to the $47{p}_{3∕2}$ Rydberg state. The resonant electric dipole-dipole interactions between atoms in these two states were probed using the linewidth of the two-photon microwave transition $46{d}_{5∕2}\text{\ensuremath{-}}47{d}_{5∕2}$. The presence of a weak magnetic field $\ensuremath{\approx}0.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{G}$ reduced the observed line broadening, indicating that the interaction is suppressed by the field. The field removes some of the energy degeneracies responsible for the resonant interaction, and this is the basis for a quantitative model of the resulting suppression. A technique for the calibration of magnetic field strengths using the $34{s}_{1∕2}\text{\ensuremath{-}}34{p}_{1∕2}$ one-photon transition is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207