Short and long alteplase dwells in dysfunctional hemodialysis catheters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis catheter dysfunction (CD) is the inability to attain adequate blood pump speeds (BPS) and is attributed to thrombus or catheter malposition; alteplase (TPA) is often given in a variety of dwell times to treat CD. The purpose of this study was to determine if TPA dwell time affects short- or long-term catheter patency rates. METHODS: Sixty hemodialysis (HD) patients with CD, as defined by BPS of < 250 mL/min, were randomized to receive either 1- or > 48-hr (to subsequent HD run) TPA dwell. The primary outcomes were catheter patency (BPS of > 250 mL/min) at the subsequent HD run and catheter patency at 2 weeks. The secondary outcome was the time from study entry to the next catheter intervention (including subsequent TPA installation). RESULTS: After TPA installation, a 78% overall catheter patency rate was observed at the subsequent HD run, falling to 48% patency at 2 weeks. There is no statistically significant difference between the short and long TPA dwell groups for catheter patency at the subsequent HD run (76.9% vs. 79.4%) or at 2 weeks (42.3% vs. 52.9%). Multivariate analysis demonstrates that the use of TPA on two or more previous occasions is a predictor of TPA failure both at the subsequent HD run and at 2 weeks. TPA installation achieves a median catheter function time of only 14 days, after which CD reoccurs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although patency for the next HD run can be achieved with either short or long TPA dwell, neither is reliable in terms of long-term patency. Strategies that employ TPA for CD are temporary and allow a 2-week window during which more definitive therapies for HD access should be sought.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".