MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988982561 · doi:10.3766/jaaa.19.5.3

Multifrequency Tympanometry in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Well Babies

2008· article· en· W1988982561 on OpenAlexaff
Navid Shahnaz, Terence T. Miranda, Linda Polka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTympanometryNeonatal intensive care unitAudiologyMedicineIntensive care unitPediatricsHearing lossAudiometryIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Conventional low probe tone frequency tympanometry has not been successful in identifying middle ear effusion in newborn infants due to differences in the physiological properties of the middle ear in newborn infants and adults. With a rapid increase in newborn hearing screening programs, there is a need for a reliable test of middle ear function for the infant population. In recent years, new evidence has shown that tympanometry performed at higher probe tone frequencies may be more sensitive to middle ear disease than conventional low probe tone frequency in newborn infants. PURPOSE: The main goal of this study was to explore the characteristics of the normal middle ear in the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) and well babies using conventional and multifrequency tympanometry (MFT). It was also within the scope of this study to compare conventional and MFT patterns in NICU and well babies to already established patterns in adults to identify ways to improve hearing assessment in newborns and young infants. METHODS: Three experiments were conducted using standard and MFT involving healthy babies and NICU babies. NICU babies (n = 33), healthy three-week-old babies (n=16), and neonates on high-priority hearing registry (HPHR) (n=42) were tested. Thirty-two ears of 16 healthy Caucasian adults (compared to well-babies) and 47 ears of 26 healthy Caucasian adults (compared to NICU babies) were also included in this study. RESULTS: The distribution of the Vanhuyse patterns as well as variation of admittance phase and peak compensated susceptance and conductance at different probe tone frequencies was also explored. In general, in both well babies and NICU babies, 226 Hz tympanograms are typically multipeaked in ears that passed or referred on transient otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), limiting the specificity and sensitivity of this measure for differentiating normal and abnormal middle ear conditions. Tympanograms obtained at 1 kHz are potentially more sensitive and specific to presumably abnormal and normal middle ear conditions. Tympanometry at 1 kHz is also a good predictor of presence or absence of TEOAE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of AudiologySame topicEar Surgery and Otitis MediaFrench-language works237,207