Screening and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to the surface antigens of<i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>serotype 4b
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: This study aims to develop and characterize monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) with high specificity and affinity for surface antigens of an epidemiologically important serotype 4b of Listeria monocytogenes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hybridoma clones were derived from B lymphocytes of mice immunized with L. monocytogenes serotype 4b and screened against this strain by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Twenty-nine clones secreting Mabs reactive with formalin-killed bacteria were obtained; 15, 8, 5 and 1 Mabs were immunoglobulin subclasses IgG2a, IgG2b, IgM and IgG1, respectively. Immunofluorescence or immunogold labelling demonstrated all except five IgM and one IgG2a Mabs bound to the surface of a live L. monocytogenes serotype 4b. The majority of the 23 surface-binding Mabs recognized linear epitopes on a 77-kDa protein. These surface-binding Mabs exhibited little or no cross-reactivity with non-4b serotypes (1/2a, 1/2b, 3a, etc.) of L. monocytogenes, five other Listeria species, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. CONCLUSIONS: The Mabs recognizing a 77-kDa surface protein are novel antibodies with specificity and affinity for L. monocytogenes serotype 4b. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These anti-77 kDa surface protein Mabs may be explored as reagents for the development of Mabs-based diagnostic immunoassays for L. monocytogenes serotype 4b strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".