The hutterite variant of treacher collins syndrome: A 28‐year‐old story solved
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS), the best known form of mandibulofacial dysostosis (MFD) comprises a recognizable pattern of anomalies. In 1985, Lowry et al. reported on two Hutterite sisters born to apparently unaffected parents with TCS, raising the possibility of an autosomal recessive (AR) variant of TCS, subsequently given a unique Mendelian Inheritance of Man (MIM) number (248390). Recently, biallelic mutations in POLR1C were found in TCS patients, confirming AR TCS as a distinct entity. The Hutterites, an endogamous Anabaptist group, like other genetically isolated populations, provide a powerful resource for mapping AR disorders. We elected to study the molecular basis of TCS in the Hutterite population including the original kindred described in 1985, and another unrelated Hutterite patient. Prior to starting this study, a TCOF1 mutation had apparently been excluded in the original family at two outside institutions. We hypothesized that an AR variant of TCS was present in the three Hutterite patients, but homozygosity mapping did not show convincing evidence of shared regions between the affected individuals. TCOF1 analysis was undertaken and mutations were found in the three affected patients and an unaffected parent. These data show that the initial Hutterite family reported with AR TCS in fact has classic TCS due to a TCOF1 mutation, despite recent data confirming the existence of AR TCS in other populations. These results have significant counseling implications for the affected families in the Hutterite population and in the population at large. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".