Evaluation of Agronomic and Economic Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Additions to Green Pepper with Drip Fertigation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drip fertigation is an effective way in splitting soluble fertilizer application to simultaneously meet water and nutrient demands of multi‐harvested green pepper ( Capsicum annuum L.). However, fruit yield and the profitability of green pepper can be constrained, if nutrients are either insufficiently or excessively supplied. A 3‐yr experiment was conducted to assess both agronomic and economic effects of fertilizer N and P addition for green pepper grown under drip fertigation. Both fruit yields, including total and marketable, and net economic return responded quadratically to fertilizer N rate. The 3‐yr average maximum marketable yield of 38 Mg ha −1 was achieved at the N rate of 227 kg N ha −1 The economic optimum N rate was identical to the one required for the production of maximum marketable yield, due to the large price ratio of green pepper to fertilizer N. Nitrogen use efficiency and N agronomic efficiency decreased as N rate increased. The amount of fertilizer N required for production of each megagram of marketable fruit yield increased with the level of yield, with an average of 6.0 kg N Mg −1 fruit across the 3 yr at the maximum marketable yield. Fertilizer P did not affect selected variables, except for both total and marketable fruit yields that increased linearly with increases in P rate in one of the 3 yr. The results suggested that an increase in the optimum N rate to 227 kg N ha −1 is needed to maximize the profitability of green pepper production with drip fertigation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it