Chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNA in two extant species of North American mudminnows <i>Umbra pygmaea</i> and <i>U. limi</i> (Euteleostei: Umbridae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The locations and chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sites in the karyotypes of two extant North American species of mudminnows, Umbra pygmaea and U. limi (2n = 22, NF = 44), were analyzed sequentially by conventional Giemsa staining, Ag staining, CMA(3) fluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) were located in the fourth chromosomal pair in both species (pericentromeric region in U. pygmaea and subtelomeric in U. LIMI). These sites were strongly CMA(3)-positive suggesting that the rDNA sites in these species are associated with GC-rich DNA. FISH with a rDNA probe gave consistently positive signals in the same regions detected by Ag-staining and CMA(3)-fluorescence. However, both species also had additional CMA(3)-positive/Ag-negative heterochromatic blocks at pericentrometric regions of several chromosomal pairs (three in U. pygmaea and five in U. limi). FISH revealed additional rDNA clusters in both species. It is hypothesized that a paracentric inversion of the chromosome arm carrying the NORs might be one of the rearrangements differentiating the karyotypes of two North American species. The presence of additional rDNA sites is indicative of more complex rearrangements. The pericentromeric NOR phenotype of Umbra pygmaea is similar to that seen in U. krameri and in the distantly related genus Esox.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".