Chemosensory and Neural Influences on Photoperiodic Responsiveness of Laboratory Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Olfactory bulbectomy unmasks photoperiodic responsiveness in normally nonphotoperiodic rats. We assessed whether the photoperiodic effects of bulbectomy reflect disruption of chemosensory input. At 26-28 days of age, male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to removal of their vomeronasal organ (VNO) complex, a sham-VNO ablation or large electrolytic lesions aimed at the pyriform cortex or corticomedial nuclei of the amygdala. Other rats were infused with (1) 7.5% ZnSO4, a treatment that destroys the olfactory neuroepithelium, (2) 0.09% saline, or (3) air in each external nare every 4 days; rats from each treatment condition were assigned either to a long (LD 14:10) or short (LD 8:16) day lighting regimen and were autopsied at 90 days of age. Seminal vesicle and paired testes weights did not differ significantly among long-day groups. Mean seminal vesicle and paired testes weights were decreased only in short-day rats treated with ZnSO4. These results indicate that the VNO does not mediate the effects of photoperiod on rat reproduction. Olfactory information, not transduced by the amygdala, or nonsensory components of the olfactory bulbs appear to mask photoperiodism in intact rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".