Arterial Onyx Embolisation of Intracranial DAVFs with Cortical Venous Drainage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present our experience with the endovascular management of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with direct cortical venous drainage by trans-arterial embolisation using Onyx. MATERIALS & METHODS: Between January 2004 and April 2008, 12 consecutive high grade intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (Cognard type III (eight patients) or IV (three patients)) were treated by trans-arterial embolisation with Onyx. The majority of cases were treated by Onyx embolisation alone. One case had additional embolisation with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate at the same session. Imaging follow-up was obtained in all but one patient (mean 3.6 months). RESULTS: Nine patients had a technical success at the end of the embolisation procedure with complete angiographic exclusion of the fistula. Two patients had a small residual fistula at the end of embolisation, one of which had residual mild cortical venous drainage. Both were stable at follow-up angiography. One patient had a residual fistula supplied by the ophthalmic artery, which was thought to be unsafe to embolise and was sent for surgery, which was curative. In one patient the microcatheter ruptured, with a fragment of the distal microcatheter left in the occipital artery. No clinical complications were observed in this series at clinical follow-up (mean 3.3 months). Two patients were noted to have significant radiation dose. CONCLUSION: Endovascular management of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with direct venous cortical drainage by trans-arterial Onyx embolisation is a safe and effective treatment according to our experience. Fluoroscopy times and radiation dose may be a concern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".