Gas‐phase ethylene polymerization over polymer‐supported metallocene catalysts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The activities of two ( n ‐BuCp) 2 ZrCl 2 catalysts supported on methylaluminoxane (MAO)‐treated polymer particles were evaluated. The supports were spherical polymeric particles, containing macropores and prepared by suspension polymerization of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate, divinyl benzene, ethyl styrene, and styrene. Both catalysts had a Zr content of 0.31 mass % and an Al/Zr ratio of 185; the supports for one of the catalysts contained 59 mass % 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate, whereas the support for the other catalyst had a 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate content of 10 mass %. Ethylene homo‐ and ethylene/1‐hexene copolymerization activities were determined for gas‐phase operation at temperatures of 50 to 90°C and ethylene pressures of ≈1.4 MPa. Polymerization activities were strong functions of temperature and 1‐hexene concentration; copolymerization activities of up to 23,200 kg PE/(mol Zr h −1 ) were obtained for 1‐h polymerization runs. The product particle morphology was excellent, mostly spherical particles essentially without fines. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the spherical copolymer particles, for all copolymerization conditions, consisted of well‐defined concentric spherical shells. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90:1319–1330, 2003
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it