MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989265974 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/6/002

Localization of random copolymers and the Morita approximation

2005· article· en· W1989265974 on OpenAlexafffund
G K Iliev, Andrew Rechnitzer, S G Whittington

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and General · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAustralian Mathematical Sciences InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Melbourne
KeywordsPhase diagramRandom phase approximationPhase (matter)Plane (geometry)Focus (optics)Statistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsGeometryQuantum mechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss and analyse the Morita approximation for a number of different models of quenched random copolymer localization at the interface between two immiscible liquids. We focus on two directed models, bilateral Dyck paths and bilateral Motzkin paths, for which this approximation can be carried through analytically. We study the form of the phase diagram and find that the Morita approximation gives phase boundaries which are qualitatively correct. This is also true when a monomer–interface interaction is included in the model. When this interaction is attractive it can lead to separation of the phase boundaries, which is also a feature of the quenched problem. We note the existence of non-analytic points on the phase boundaries which may reflect tricritical points on the phase boundaries of the full quenched average problem. In certain regions of the phase plane this approximation can be extended to the self-avoiding walk model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and GeneralSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207