Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the first Chinese-Canadian woman to occupy the position of Governor-General of Canada, Adrienne Clarkson attracted special attention from the start of her appointment. However, both the praise for her performance and the criticism of her alleged shortcomings drew extensively on reports in the media that accompanied her previous work, over several decades, as a journalist, editor, and diplomat. Clarkson’s travels in the company of representatives from the arts, sciences, and commerce were a special target, yet Clarkson has cited these, along with the lessons learned during past travels including a trip to China in pursuit of her heritage, as proof of a successfully fulfilled mandate. Thus, Canada’s House: Rideau Hall and the Invention of a Canadian Home (2004), a book produced by the historian Margaret MacMillan and others “in conversation with Adrienne Clarkson and John Ralston Saul,” describes Rideau Hall as the focal point of international mobility. This article looks at women and the office of Governor-General in Canada, including the “chatelaines” (Governor-Generals’ spouses), concentrating on middlebrow sources and paying special attention to the motif of travel. The purpose is to study the media coverage of the various roles Adrienne Clarkson has played in her professional life as a flashpoint of Canadian attitudes toward ambitious professional women generally and high-aiming ethnic women specifically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.044 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".