MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989299906 · doi:10.4088/jcp.13r08379

Reduction of Alcohol Consumption and Subsequent Mortality in Alcohol Use Disorders

2013· review· en· W1989299906 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael Roerecke, Antoni Gual, Jürgen Rehm

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbstinenceOdds ratioAlcoholAlcohol use disorderPoison controlCohort studyInjury preventionCohortAlcohol abuseAlcohol consumptionDemographyAlcohol dependenceInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPsychiatryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article AbstractObjective: To determine whether a reduction in drinking in individuals with alcohol use disorders resulted in reduced mortality risk.Data Sources: Electronic searches were performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science and references of identified articles were searched up to May 2012 using these keywords: (alcohol dependence OR alcohol abuse) AND (mortality) AND (cohort OR follow-up). Only English-language articles were included.Study Selection: Sixteen cohort studies were identified that reported all-cause mortality risk by drinking groups measuring change in alcohol intake among people with alcohol use disorders.Data Extraction: Numbers of participants and deaths in each group; odds ratios (ORs); and demographic, clinical, and methodological variables were extracted.Results: In comparison to continued heavy drinking, a reduction below heavy levels of alcohol use (including abstention) was associated with a substantially reduced risk of mortality (random-effects pooled OR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.34-0.50; P < .001). The OR was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.20-0.60; P < .001) for those who reached abstention and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.94; P = .026) for those who did not reach abstention but substantially reduced their consumption. The pooled OR for abstention compared to reduced consumption was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.19-0.92; P = .031). Meta-regression models did not reveal significant influences of study characteristics examined.Conclusions: Reduction of drinking in alcohol use disorders was associated with a marked reduction in mortality risk for those who reached abstinence or reduced drinking compared to continued heavy drinkers. Those who reached abstention showed the smallest mortality risk, lower than the risk for reduced consumption without abstinence.J Clin Psychiatry 2013;74(12):e1181-e1189© Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.Submitted: January 17, 2013; accepted August 20, 2013 (doi:10.4088/JCP.13r08379).Corresponding author: Michael Roerecke, PhD, Social and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Russell St, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada (m.roerecke@web.de).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical PsychiatrySame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207