MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989329687 · doi:10.1210/endo.142.1.7895

Differential Regulation of Two Forms of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in Human Granulosa-Luteal Cells**This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada.

2001· article· en· W1989329687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrinology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsGonadotropin-releasing hormoneGNRHREndocrinologyInternal medicineMessenger RNAGonadotropin-releasing hormone receptorAgonistGonadotropinBiologyBuserelinHormoneReceptorLuteinizing hormoneMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until recently, the primate brain was thought to contain only one form of GnRH known as mammalian GnRH (GnRH-I). The recent cloning of a second form of GnRH (GnRH-II) with characteristics of chicken GnRH-II in the primate brain has prompted a reevaluation of the role of GnRH in reproductive functions. In the present study, we investigated the hormonal regulation of GnRH-II messenger RNA (mRNA) and its functional role in the human granulosa-luteal cells (hGLCs), and we provided novel evidence for differential hormonal regulation of GnRH-II vs. GnRH-I mRNA expression. Human GLCs were treated with various concentrations of GnRH-II, GnRH-II agonist (GnRH-II-a), or GnRH-I agonist (GnRH-I-a; leuprolide) in the absence or presence of FSH or human CG (hCG). The expression levels of GnRH-II, GnRH-I, and GnRH receptor (GnRHR) mRNA were investigated using semiquantitative or competitive RT-PCR. A significant decrease in GnRH-II and GnRHR mRNA levels was observed in cells treated with GnRH-II or GnRH-II-a. In contrast, GnRH-I-a revealed a biphasic effect (up- and down-regulation) of GnRH-I and GnRHR mRNA, suggesting that GnRH-I and GnRH-II may differentially regulate GnRHR and their ligands (GnRH-I and GnRH-II). Treatment with FSH or hCG increased GnRH-II mRNA levels but decreased GnRH-I mRNA levels, further indicating that GnRH-I and GnRH-II mRNA levels are differentially regulated. To investigate the physiological role of GnRH-II, hGLCs were treated with GnRH-II or GnRH-II-a in the presence or absence of hCG, for 24 h, and progesterone secretion was measured by RIA. Both GnRH-II and GnRH-II-a inhibited basal and hCG-stimulated progesterone secretion, effects which were similar to the effects of GnRH-I treatment on ovarian steroidogenesis. Next, hGLCs were treated with various concentrations of GnRH-II, GnRH-II-a, or GnRH-I-a; and the expression levels of FSH receptor and LH receptor were investigated using semiquantitative RT-PCR. A significant down-regulation of FSH receptor and LH receptor was observed in cells treated with GnRH-II, GnRH-II-a, and GnRH-I-a, demonstrating that GnRH-II and GnRH-I may exert their antigonadotropic effect by down-regulating gonadotropin receptors. Interestingly, GnRH-II and GnRH-II-a did not affect basal and hCG-stimulated intracellular cAMP accumulation, suggesting that the antigonadotropic effect of GnRH-II may be independent of modulation of cAMP levels. Taken together, these results suggest that GnRH-II may have biological effects similar to those of GnRH-I but is under differential hormonal regulation in the human ovary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it