Soil and vegetation characteristics of a peatland near Lake Édouard in Mauricie National Park, Québec, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The majority of plant communities within the peatland near Lake Édouard belongs to the poor fen group. They are containing poor fen species such as <i>Myrica gale</i>, <i>Carex rostrata</i>, <i>Glyceria canadensis</i>, <i>Calamagrostis canadensis</i>, <i>Carex canescens</i>, <i>Carex stricta</i>, <i>Alnus rugosa</i> and <i>Sphagnum subsecundum</i>. Members of these taxa grow in association with a group of marsh species and with <i>Chamaedaphne calyculata</i> and <i>Sphagnum majus</i>, species characteristic of bogs. The soil are of the humisol great group, being well decomposed and relatively rich in nutrient elements but ranging from extremely to strongly acidic. Four new associations are noted: <i>Sphagno-Juncetum brevicaudati</i>, <i>Sphagno-Hypericetum boreale</i>, <i>Sphagno-Glycerietum canadensis</i> and <i>Carici canescenti</i>-<i>Sphagnetum maji</i>. The distribution of vegetation appears dependent on ground relief and, consequently, on the level and quality of water in the peatland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it