MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989383352 · doi:10.1071/rdv25n1ab107

107 DETECTION OF BIOTINYLATED-OVULATION-INDUCING FACTOR (OIF) IN CEREBROSPINAL FLUID AND ITS ABILITY TO INDUCE OVULATION

2012· article· en· W1989383352 on OpenAlex
Marco Berland, M. Guerra, O. A. Bogle, Karin Vío, Gregory P. Adams, Marcelo Ratto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationCorpus luteumBiotinylationCerebrospinal fluidEndocrinologyInternal medicineChoroid plexusAndrologyBiologyMedicineChemistryHormoneCentral nervous systemMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) is a protein in the seminal plasma of llamas that induces a preovulatory LH surge by acting directly or indirectly on the hypothalamic GnRH neurons (Silva et al. 2011 Reprod. Biol. Endocr. 9, 74). We hypothesize that OIF crosses the blood–brain barrier and reaches the hypothalamus via secretion into the cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) through the choroid plexus. Two experiments were designed to determine whether biotinylation of OIF (as a tracer) alters its bioactivity in a llama model (Experiment 1) and whether it crosses the blood–brain barrier in a rabbit model (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, llamas with a follicle =8 mm in diameter that had grown for 3 consecutive days were assigned randomly to 5 groups (n = 2/group) and given an IV dose of 1) 800 µg of OIF, 2) 800 µg of OIF biotinylated at the amino end; 3) 1600 µg of OIF biotinylated at the amino end, 4) 800 µg of OIF biotinylated at the carboxyl end, or 5) phosphate buffered saline (control). The ovaries were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography on Day 3 and 8 after treatment (Day 0 = treatment) to detect ovulation and corpus luteum formation. In Experiment 2, adult female rabbits were assigned randomly to 3 groups and given an IV dose of (1) 250 µg of OIF, (2) 250 µg of OIF biotinylated at the amino end, or (3) 250 µg of OIF biotinylated at the carboxyl end. A 50-µL sample of CSF was collected from the cisterna magna under general anesthesia before (0 min) and 10, 20, 30, and 45 min after treatment. The presence of biotinylated OIF in CSF samples was determined by dot blot, using streptavidin-peroxidase and diaminobenzidine. In Experiment 1, the diameter of the follicle at the time of the treatment did not differ among groups (9.7 ± 0.2, 9.4 ± 0.0, 10.5 ± 1.0, 10.1 ± 0.2, 10.3 ± 0.4). Ovulation was detected in all llamas except one llama treated with 800 µg OIF biotinylated at the carboxyl end and both llamas given PBS. The diameter of the corpus luteum did not differ among OIF-treated groups. In Experiment 2, OIF biotinylated at both amino and carboxyl ends was detected in CSF samples at 10, 20, 30, and 45 min after IV administration. No signal was recorded before IV administration (0 min) or in samples from rabbits that were given nonbiotinylated OIF. We conclude that the biotinylation process did not affect OIF bioactivity, and OIF crosses the blood–brain barrier and reaches the CSF in rabbits. Research supported by FONDECYT 1120518, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Alpaca Research Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it