A temperate, tidal lake‐wetland complex 1. Water balance and ecological implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A water‐balance model was developed for a tidal lake‐wetland complex to: (1) determine the relative contribution of hydrological flows through the lake‐wetland complex; (2) determine the tidal and non‐tidal hydraulic residence times of two lakes in the lake‐wetland complex; and (3) estimate the potential importance of groundwater inputs to the lake‐wetland complex. All surface hydrological inputs to the system were either measured or estimated over 1 year. Daily evaporation from the water bodies was also estimated. Discharge at the outflow of the lake‐wetland complex was monitored to calculate the net daily outflow. A correction procedure was used to remove the error resulting from aliasing of the daily calculation period and the tidal period. The difference between the measured net outflow and that calculated by the water‐balance model indicated that a large amount of net discharge from the lake‐wetland complex may have been a result of previously unrecognised groundwater inputs to the system. The non‐tidal hydraulic residence times of the two lakes differed markedly as did the relative importance of tidal inflows. The influence of variation in tidal and non‐tidal hydraulic residence time on limnological processes is discussed, particularly with respect to impacts of global climate change on tidal lake ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".