MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989493703 · doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0613

Local Inhibition of Rho Signaling by Cell-Permeable Recombinant Protein BA-210 Prevents Secondary Damage and Promotes Functional Recovery following Acute Spinal Cord Injury

2008· article· en· W1989493703 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephanie Lord-Fontaine, Fan Yang, Quy N. Diep, Pauline Dergham, Scott Munzer, Patrick Tremblay, Lisa McKerracher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSpinal cordSpinal cord injuryMedicineFibrinLesionAnesthesiaCordPharmacologyPathologySurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to robust Rho activation at the lesion site. Here, we demonstrate that BA-210, a cell-permeable fusion protein derived from C3 transferase, formulated in fibrin sealant and delivered topically onto the dura matter, diffuses into the spinal cord and inactivates Rho in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with BA-210 in rats with thoracic spinal cord contusion increased tissue sparing around the lesion area and led to significant improvement of locomotor function. In mice, BA-210 improved functional outcome when treatment was either applied at the time of injury or delayed by 24 h. In both rats and mice, treatment with BA-210 was well tolerated. Rats gained body weight normally, and BA-210 treatment had no impact on the development of allodynia. Inactivating Rho with BA-210 holds promise for treating patients with SCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurotraumaSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207