MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989585615 · doi:10.1097/hp.0b013e3181cfe1e9

PERFORMANCE OF A HIGH SENSITIVITY MULTI-ELEMENT TISSUE EQUIVALENT PROPORTIONAL COUNTER FOR RADIATION PROTECTION NEUTRON MONITORING MEASUREMENTS

2010· article· en· W1989585615 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProportional counterSensitivity (control systems)RadiationRadiation protectionEquivalent doseNeutronPhysicsNuclear physicsNuclear engineeringRadiochemistryNuclear medicineChemistryOpticsMedicineDetectorEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes the performance of a novel design of compact multi-element tissue equivalent proportional counter (METEPC), which consists of 61 individual cylindrical counting volumes machined in a single block of tissue equivalent plastic. Each counting volume is a separate cylinder of internal diameter of 0.5 cm and height 5 cm. The performance of the METEPC was examined experimentally to obtain microdosimetric information, absorbed dose, dose equivalent, and sensitivity in the neutron energy range of 34 to 423 keV where commercially available tissue equivalent proportional counters (TEPCs) under respond as much as 40% of the ambient dose equivalent. A simple elongated cylindrical sampling geometry of METEPC provides very good estimates of microdosimetric average, y(D), and dosimetric quantities of interest, H*(10) and Q, which are comparable to those obtained with the conventional spherical sampling geometry of a standard TEPC. The sensitivity of METEPC is comparable to that of a conventional 12.7 cm diameter TEPC, which suggests that it is able to produce measurements in low dose rate radiation environments with the same precision in a given length of time as that obtained with the conventional TEPC. METEPC, being possibly the simplest design available in the multi-element geometrical configuration and approximately 9 times smaller in volume than that of a conventional 12.7 cm diameter TEPC, could form the basis of a portable monitoring system in mixed field radiation environments and may also be useful for radiation dosimetric measurements in beams of limited cross-sections and in phantoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it