Insights into the Formation and Degradation Mechanisms of Methylenedinitramine during the Incubation of RDX with Anaerobic Sludge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an earlier study, we reported that hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) biodegraded with domestic anaerobic sludge to produce a key RDX ring cleavage intermediate that was tentatively identified as methylenedinitramine (O2NNHCH2NHNO2) using LC/MS with negative electrospray ionization (ES-). Recently, we obtained a standard material of methylenedinitramine and thus were able to confirm its formation as the key initial RDX intermediate. In water alone or in the presence of sludge, methylenedinitramine decomposed to N20 and HCHO. Only in the presence of sludge HCHO converted further to carbon dioxide. To test our hypothesis that water was involved in the formation of methylenedinitramine during incubation of RDX with sludge, we allowed the energetic compound to biodegrade in several D2O/H2O solutions (90, 50, and 0% v/v). We observed three distinctive deprotonated or dedeuterated mass ions at 135, 136, and 137 Da that were attributed to the formation of nondeuterated (H-methylenedinitramine), monodeuterated (D1-methylenedinitramine), and dideuterated methylenedinitramine (D2-methylenedinitramine), respectively. Two controls were prepared in D2O both in the absence of sludge; the first contained methylenedinitramine, and the second contained RDX. Neither control produced any deuterated methylenedinitramine, thus excluding the occurrence of any abiotic D/H exchange between D2O and either methylenedinitramine or RDX. The results supported the occurrence of an initial enzymatic reaction on RDX, yet they did not provide compelling evidence on whether methylenedinitramine was an initial RDX enzymatic hydrolysis product or simply formed via the spontaneous hydrolysis of an anonymous initial RDX enzymatic product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".