Identification of Chlorinated Dimethoxystilbene Isomers and Homologues in Bleached Paper Products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report here the identification of a novel class of compounds, the chlorinated dimethoxystilbenes (pinosylvins), in bleached paper products. Pinosylvins are naturally occurring compounds in wood that deter infections and predators. These compounds are being chlorinated during the pulp bleaching process. Two dichlorinated pinosylvins have previously been identified in bleached paper pulp, but we have identified other isomers and more highly chlorinated homologues in various bleached paper products. These compounds are present at concentrations on the order of hundreds of ppb. On the basis of the mass spectra of synthesized standards, we can distinguish the isomers in which the chlorines are located on the ethylene moiety from those in which the chlorines are located on the aromatic ring with the methoxy groups. In addition, we can predict the chlorine substitution patterns on both rings for these compounds using linear relationships between retention indexes and calculated dipole moments. The toxicity of these compounds is not known; however, isomers related to the pesticide methoxychlor are proestrogenic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".