Characterization of Two Independent Amino Acid Substitutions that Disrupt the DNA Repair Functions of the Yeast Apn1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The members of the Endo IV family of DNA repair enzymes, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae Apn1 and Escherichia coli endonuclease IV, possess the capacity to cleave abasic sites and to remove 3'-blocking groups at single-strand breaks via apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease and 3'-diesterase activities, respectively. In addition, Endo IV family members are able to recognize and incise oxidative base damages on the 5'-side of such lesions. We previously identified eight amino acid substitutions that prevent E. coli endonuclease IV from repairing damaged DNA in vivo. Two of these substitutions were glycine replacements of Glu145 and Asp179. Both Glu145 and Asp179 are among nine amino acid residues within the active site pocket of endonuclease IV that coordinate the position of a trinuclear Zn cluster required for efficient phosphodiester bond cleavage. We now report the first structure-function analysis of the eukaryotic counterpart of endonuclease IV, yeast Apn1. We show that glycine substitutions at the corresponding conserved amino acid residues of yeast Apn1, i.e., Glu158 and Asp192, abolish the biological function of this enzyme. However, these Apn1 variants do not exhibit the same characteristics as the corresponding E. coli mutants. Indeed, the Apn1 Glu158Gly mutant, but not the E. coli endonuclease IV Glu145Gly mutant, is able to bind DNA. Moreover, Apn1 Asp192Gly completely lacks enzymatic activity, while the activity of the E. coli counterpart Asp179Gly is reduced by approximately 40-fold. The data suggest that although yeast Apn1 and E. coli endonuclease IV exhibit a high degree of structural and functional similarity, differences exist within the active site pockets of these two enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".