Kochite, a new member of the rosenbuschite group from the Werner Bjerge alkaline complex, East Greenland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kochite, ideally Na 2 (Na,Ca) 4 Ca 4 (Mn,Ca) 2 Zr 2 Ti 2 (Si 2 O 7 ) 4 (O,F) 4 F 4 , is a new member of the rosenbuschite group from the alkaline complex of Werner Bjerge, East Greenland. It occurs in nepheline syenite as lath-shaped to acicular crystals in aggregates up to 0.3 × 1.0 mm. Associated minerals are nepheline, alkali feldspar and lavenite. It is transparent with a brownish colour and has a vitreous lustre. It is brittle with a perfect {100} cleavage and an uneven fracture. The mineral is biaxial positive with α 1.684 ± .002, β 1.695 ± .004, γ 1.718 ± .002 and 2 V meas. = 73°(2). The optical orientation is X = c and Z Λ [100] ∼ 20°. The pleochroism is weak with X = colourless and Z = pale yellow. The mineral is triclinic with a = 10.032(2), b = 11.333(2), c = 7.202(1) A, α = 90.192(4), β = 100.334(5), γ = 111.551(4) °, Z = 1. The 5 strongest X-ray lines are [ d in A (Int.)] 2.908(10), 2.600(8), 3.028(6), 1.868(6) and 1.670(5). An average of four electron microprobe analyses of kochite gave SiO 2 31.55, Al 2 O 3 0.05, V 2 O 3 0.03, TiO 2 8.44, ZrO 2 12.12, HfO 2 0.09, Nb 2 O 5 1.86, Ta 2 O 5 0.02, MgO 0.01, MnO 4.92, FeO 1.08, CaO 21.39, SrO 0.12, Na 2 O 10.33, Y 2 O 3 0.39, La 2 O 3 0.25, Ce 2 O 3 0.57, F 6.83, O ≡ F 2.88, total 97.71 wt.%. The empirical formula, based on 8 Si atoms in accordance with the structure refinement ( R ( F ) = 4.0 %), is (Na 1.70 Sr 0.02 )∑ 1.72 (Na 2.77 Ca 1.23 )∑ 4.00 (Ca 3.40 Na 0.60 )∑ 4.00 (Mn 1.06 Ca 0.82 Y 0.05 Ce 0.05 La 0.02 )∑ 2.00 (Zr 1.40 Fe 0.23 Ca 0.36 Hf 0.01 )∑ 2.00 (Ti 1.61 Nb 0.21 Zr 0.10 Al 0.05 V 0.03 )∑ 2.00 (Si 2 O 7 ) 4 F 4 (O 2.39 F 1.48 )∑ 3.87 . D meas. = 3.32, D calc. = 3.31 g/cm 3 . Kochite is an Mn − , Ti-analogue of rosenbuschite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".