MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989668607 · doi:10.1002/eji.200737130

Differential impact of the transcriptional repressor Gfi1 on mature CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T lymphocyte function

2007· article· en· W1989668607 on OpenAlexaff
Denise Pargmann, Raif Yücel, Christian Kosan, Ingrid Saba, Ludger Klein‐Hitpaß, Simone Schimmer, Florian Heyd, Ulf Dittmer, Tarik Möröy

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRepressorFunction (biology)CD8Molecular biologyGeneticsTranscription factorGeneAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transcriptional repressor Gfi1 is a nuclear zinc-finger protein that is expressed in T cell precursors in the thymus, but is down-regulated in mature, resting T cells. Gfi1 expression rises transiently to levels seen in thymocytes upon antigenic activation. We show here that lack of Gfi1 causes delayed cell cycle entry and apoptosis after antigenic stimulation in both mature CD4+ and CD8+ T cells ex vivo. DNA micro-array analysis demonstrated that this correlated with an up-regulation of the death receptor CD95, the proapoptotic factors Bad and Apaf1 and the cell cycle inhibitor p21, and a down-regulation of Bcl-2 expression in Gfi1-/- T cells. Surprisingly, while Gfi1-deficient CD4+ T cells showed the same defective behavior in vivo, Gfi1-deficient CD8+ T cells showed no aberration in vivo and were fully able to mount an anti-viral immune response. This indicates that Gfi1 exerts different functions in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells very likely by maintaining different genetic programs in both cell types, and appears to be essential for the CD4 helper T cell immune response but dispensable for the function of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207