Sustained effect of continuous positive airway pressure on baroreflex sensitivity in congestive heart failure patients with obstructive sleep apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with either heart failure or obstructive sleep apnea have a reduced baroreflex sensitivity for heart rate, a sign of poor prognosis. We previously demonstrated that nocturnal application of continuous positive airway pressure to heart failure patients with obstructive sleep apnea increased baroreflex sensitivity acutely, but it is not known whether these effects persist into wakefulness. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treating obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure patients with continuous positive airway pressure improves baroreflex sensitivity during wakefulness. METHODS: Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity was assessed during wakefulness in 33 heart failure patients (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 45%) with obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > or = 20). Subsequently, baroreflex sensitivity was reassessed 1 month after patients were randomly allocated to nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure treatment or no treatment (control). RESULTS: Compared with the 14 control patients, the 19 continuous positive airway pressure-treated patients experienced a greater increase in baroreflex sensitivity [median, (25%, 75%)] [from 5.4 (2.2, 8.3) to 7.9 (4.4, 9.4) ms/mmHg; P = 0.01] and left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001). In addition, daytime systolic blood pressure and heart rate decreased more in the continuous positive airway pressure group (from 122 +/- 15 to 113 +/- 12 mmHg; P = 0.02, and from 66 +/- 8 to 62 +/- 8 bpm; P < 0.001, respectively) than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Treatment of coexisting obstructive sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure in heart failure patients improves baroreflex sensitivity during wakefulness in addition to improving left ventricular ejection fraction and lowering blood pressure and heart rate. These data indicate that the improved autonomic regulation of heart rate in heart failure patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea during sleep persists into wakefulness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".