MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989706294 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2012.685495

Application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in combination with a mild strain of<i>Cucumber mosaic virus</i>(CMV) associated with viral satellite RNAs to enhance growth and protection against a virulent strain of CMV in tomato

2012· article· en· W1989706294 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N. Ali, Vineetha M. Cherian, Magdy S. Montasser

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizobacteriaCucumovirusBiologyCucumber mosaic virusLycopersiconSolanumStrain (injury)VirusHorticultureRhizosphereVirologyPlant virusBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An indigenous strain of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) associated with a naturally occurring benign viral satellite RNA (345 bp long), referred to as CMV-KU1, although effective as a protective biocontrol agent against the damaging effects of the virulent CMV-16 strain, produced negative side-effects such as mild stunting, vigour reduction and about 20% yield loss in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) plants. The efficacy of using a mixture of two plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas rhizophilia, to compensate for vegetative and yield loss caused by CMV-KU1 in tomato plants, was evaluated in greenhouse experiments. In addition to promoting plant growth, PGPRs are known to enhance systemic defences in plants against foliar pathogens such as viruses that attack tissues distant to PGPR sphere of activity. The use of PGPR and CMV-KU1 together successfully promoted vegetative growth and fruit yield in tomato plants to values equivalent to that of the healthy controls. The combination used also enhanced overall protection of the plants against the severe CMV-16 virus with about 91.3% disease prevention. Serological analysis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) also indicated a lower incidence of CMV-16 infection in protected test plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207