Gab2 requires membrane targeting and the met binding motif to promote lamellipodia, cell scatter, and epithelial morphogenesis downstream from the met receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gab1 and Gab2 are conserved scaffolding proteins that amplify and integrate signals stimulated by many growth factor receptors including the Met receptor. Gab1 acts to diversify the signal downstream from Met through the recruitment of multiple signaling proteins, and is essential for epithelial morphogenesis. However, whereas Gab1 and Gab2 are both expressed in epithelial cells, Gab2 fails to support a morphogenic response. We demonstrate that Gab1 and Gab2 are divergent in their function whereby Gab1, but not Gab2, promotes lamellipodia formation, and is localized to the membrane of lamellipodia upon Met activation. We have identified activation of ERK1/2 as a requirement for lamellipodia formation. Moreover, activated ERK1/2 are localized to lamellipodia in Gab1 expressing cells but not in cells that overexpress Gab2. By structure-function studies, we identify that enhanced membrane localization conferred through the addition of a myristoylation signal, together with the addition of the direct Met binding motif (MBM) from Gab1, are required to promote lamellipodia and confer a morphogenic signaling response to Gab2. Moreover, the morphogenesis competent myristoylated Gab2MBM promotes localization of activated ERK1/2 to the leading edge of lamellipodia in a similar manner to Gab1. Hence, subcellular localization of the Gab scaffold, as well as the ability of Gab to interact directly with the Met receptor, are both essential components of the morphogenic signaling response which involves lamellipodia formation and the localization of ERK1/2 activation in membrane ruffles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".