MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989889906 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2014.2360852

Source-Channel Coding for Fading Channels With Correlated Interference

2014· article· en· W1989889906 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Abou Saleh, Wai-Yip Chan, Fady Alajaji

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingComputer scienceChannel state informationTransmitterChannel (broadcasting)Upper and lower boundsAlgorithmDecoding methodsTopology (electrical circuits)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsWirelessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of sending a Gaussian source over a fading channel with Gaussian interference known to the transmitter. We study joint source-channel coding schemes for the case of unequal bandwidth between the source and the channel and when the source and the interference are correlated. An outer bound on the system's distortion is first derived by assuming additional information at the decoder side. We then propose layered coding schemes based on proper combination of power splitting, bandwidth splitting, Wyner-Ziv and hybrid coding. More precisely, a hybrid layer, that uses the source and the interference, is concatenated (superimposed) with a purely digital layer to achieve bandwidth expansion (reduction). The achievable (square error) distortion region of these schemes under matched and mismatched noise levels is then analyzed. Numerical results show that the proposed schemes perform close to the best derived bound and to be resilient to channel noise mismatch. As an application of the proposed schemes, we derive both inner and outer bounds on the source-channel-state distortion region for the fading channel with correlated interference; the receiver, in this case, aims to jointly estimate both the source signal as well as the channel-state (interference).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207