A Kinematic Model for the Narrow-Line Region in NGC 4151
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a simple kinematic model for the narrow-line region (NLR) of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 4151, based on our previous observations of extended [O III] emission with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph. The model is similar to a biconical radial outflow model developed for the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 1068, except that the bicone axis is tilted much more into our line of sight (40° out of the plane of the sky instead of 5°), and the maximum space velocities are lower (750 km s -1 instead of 1300 km s -1 ). We find evidence for radial acceleration of the emission-line knots to a distance of 160 pc, followed by deceleration that approaches the systemic velocity at a distance of 290 pc (for a distance to NGC 4151 of 13.3 Mpc). Other similarities to the kinematics of NGC 1068 are (1) there are a number of high-velocity clouds that are not decelerated, suggesting that the medium responsible for the deceleration is patchy, and (2) the bicone in NGC 4151 is at least partially evacuated along its axis. Together, these two Seyfert galaxies provide strong evidence for radial outflow (e.g., due to radiation and/or wind pressure) and against gravitational motion or expansion away from the radio jets as the principal kinematic component in the NLR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".