MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989935922 · doi:10.2118/77762-ms

The Kitchen Prospects, Cook Inlet Alaska: A Giant Natural Gas Accumulation

2002· article· en· W1989935922 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. S. Demarchos, R. C. Warthen, Derek S. Davis, Michael J. Economides

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInletNatural gasLiquefied natural gasNatural gas fieldStructural basinEnvironmental scienceGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Waste managementEngineeringOceanographyGeotechnical engineeringGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Natural gas reserves potentially rivaling those of the North Slope have been recently identified in two, never before tested structures, in the Cook Inlet Basin, Alaska. The discovery is a culmination of years of local geological experience, and seismic analysis of existing data using the Energy Absorption Analysis technique (Mitchell, 1997). It is undoubtedly the largest hydrocarbon reservoir discovery in the Cook Inlet, Alaska. They have been named as the Kitchen Prospects. One structure, which has never been tested before, is estimated to hold recoverable reserves of at least 12.7 Trillion cubic feet of gas (Tcf), which is 1 and ½ times the ultimate recovery of the Cook Inlet Basin prior to this discovery (Sherwood, 2001). The total identified recoverable natural gas reserves are estimated to be over 27 Tcf, three times the ultimate gas reserves of the Cook Inlet Basin. Full field development, based on past experiences could exceed 3 billion cubic feet of gas per day (Bcf/d). Current natural gas production in the Cook Inlet is 215 Bcf/year, net (DOE/EIA, 2001). The limited natural gas market in the Cook Inlet area (local consumption, a fertilizer plant and a small LNG plant) would pose a severe problem in developing new large natural gas reserves. However, the recent national move towards natural gas as the premier fuel of the future the recent energy crisis in California and the West Coast become compelling reasons for the expansion of the existing LNG terminal, or for a new floating LNG, which could supply California with at least 500 MMCF/d. Other options include the substantial expansion of the Ammonia/Urea plant (another 145 MMCF/d) and supplying the city of Anchorage, and Southern Eastern Alaska in general, a political obstacle to the proposed, and more logical, natural gas pipeline from the North Slope under the Beaufort Sea and down the McKenzie Delta to the Canadian pipeline system and into the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207