Study of Nucleated Red Blood Cell Counts in Asphyxiated Newborns and the Fetal Outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to find the values of n ucleated red blood cells ( NRBCs ) in normal and asphyxiated babies and their correlation with simple clinical parameter and immediate outcome of such babies. Methods: One hundred forty babies were registered for the study, with 70 as cases and 70 controls. Cord blood was collected and analyzed and the number of NRBCs was determined. It was case-control prospective study. Results: The mean NRBC level in cases and control groups was 17.43 ± 19.86/100 white blood cells (WBCs) and 2.97 ± 4.79/100 WBCs respectively (P < 0.0001). The 41.43% of babies did not develop hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Stage I HIE was seen in 14.28% of the babies, while stage II and stage III HIE were seen in 31.43% and 12.86% babies respectively. The mean NRBCs were 4.48, 11.10, 25.95 and 45.55/100 WBCs in no HIE and stage I, II and III HIE respectively. The NRBC counts are significantly different according to the stages of HIE (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: NRBCs can be considered as a marker of perinatal asphyxia and significantly correlated with the degree of asphyxia. NRBCs can be used to determine the grade of HIE in asphyxiated neonates. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2014;3(3):79-85 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/ijcp169w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".