Biochemical and virological analysis of the preference for the K65R multi-resistance nucleoside mutation in subtype C viruses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients carrying subtype C viruses in Botswana, Malawi, and South Africa are prone to develop the K65R mutation in RT after receiving d4T or ddI/d4T in therapy. We have studied the effect of subtype C polymorphisms at position 64/65 and at TAM sites (70, 210, 219) in RT on pathway outcome in cell culture, utilizing N(t)RTI drug pressure alone and in combination. We compared mutations of the subtype B NL4-3 (wt) sequence at sites 64, 65, 70, 210, 219 with silent polymorphisms found in the subtype C consensus sequence. Site-directed mutagenesis of the NL4-3 (wt) plasmid was used to generate all mutant plasmids. Selections in MT-2 cells were performed with each of 3TC, FTC, TDF, ABC, ATC, d4T, and ddI either alone or in combination. Recombinant RT enzymes of both subtype B and C origin were also studied in cell-free reactions. Selections with 3TC, FTC, TDF, ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC did not reveal any significant differences between subtype B NL4-3 viruses in terms of mutations acquired. However, exposure of NL4-3 containing subtype C coding sequences at positions 64/65 to ABC, ATC, d4T, ddI, ABC/FTC, TDF/3TC and d4T/ddI always resulted in the selection of K65R. This result was not obtained with viruses that contained subtype C coding sequences at either positions 64 or 65 but not both. Most importantly, addition of the silent polymorphisms at TAM sites eased the pressure for the preferential selection of K65R in the newly created NL4-3 (C 64/65/70), NL4-3 (C 64/65/70/219) and NL4-3 (C 64/65/70/210/219) viruses. We have also shown that pausing in cell-free RT reactions occurs preferentially at the 64/65 site and that this is entierly template-driven and is not dependent on the origin of the RT enzyme employed. Silent polymorphisms at both positions 64 and 65 favor the development of K65R in subtype C viruses, but this effect can be attenuated by silent polymorphisms at TAM sites 70/210/219. These biochemical and tissue culture findings are of clinical relevance in view of the fact that d4T-containing regimens are extensively used in developing country settings and because the K65R mutation is also responsible for cross-resistance to multiple members of the N(t)RTI family of drugs. Thus, many second line regimens that might otherwise be considered after failure of a d4T-based regimen might no longer be useful in patients with subtype C viruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".