MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990014617 · doi:10.1094/phyto.2001.91.2.197

Differential Accumulation of <i>Potato virus</i> A and Expression of Pathogenesis-Related Genes in Resistant Potato cv. Shepody upon Graft Inoculation

2001· article· en· W1990014617 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xianzhou Nie, R. P. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytopathology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsBiologyChlorosisInoculationPathogenesisSolanaceaeNecrosisRootstockGene expressionSolanumPlant virusGeneVirusSolanum tuberosumHorticultureBotanyVirologyGeneticsImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cv. Shepody is highly resistant to Potato virus A (PVA), yielding no visible symptoms after rub inoculation. In 'Shepody' rootstocks graft-inoculated by PVA-infected scions from a susceptible host, we found a resistance consisting of traces of necrosis (necrotic streaks) in stems and chlorosis in newly emerged leaves. The response was temperature dependent, appearing at 15 to 18 degrees C but not at 28 to 31 degrees C. Necrosis was also observed in tubers, appearing first in the bud end and spreading randomly throughout the majority of the tuber. Trace amounts of PVA in plant tissues were detected by a combination of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot procedures. The virus concentration was significantly higher in visibly necrotic areas than in nonnecrotic areas, suggesting that presence of the necrosis may be concentration dependent. Pathogenesis-related gene expression showed that chitinase A and B, glucanase B, and PR-10a were associated with chlorotic or necrotic symptoms in leaves, stems, and tubers. Gene expression was markedly more evident in tuber tissues than in leaves and stems. Furthermore, generation of oxidants was also observed within the necrotic areas. Although PVA was detected in necrotic areas of tubers, newly emerged plants from the same tubers were PVA-free.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytopathologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207