Partitioning of Lipidated Peptide Sequences into Liquid-Ordered Lipid Domains in Model and Biological Membranes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have used a fluorescence assay and detergent fractionation to examine the partitioning of different fluorescent lipidated peptides, with sequences and lipid substituents matching those found in various classes of lipidated cellular proteins, into liquid-ordered (raft-like) domains in lipid bilayers. Peptides incorporating isoprenyl groups, or multiple unsaturated acyl chains, show negligible affinity for liquid-ordered domains in mixed-phase liquid-ordered/liquid-disordered (l(o)/l(d)) bilayers composed of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, a spin-labeled unsaturated phosphatidylcholine, and cholesterol. By contrast, peptides incorporating multiple S- and/or N-acyl chains, or a cholesterol residue plus an N-terminal palmitoyl chain, show significant partitioning into liquid-ordered domains under the same conditions. Interestingly, the affinity of a lipidated peptide for l(o) domains can be strongly influenced, not only by the structures of the lipid substituents but also by the nature and the positions of their attachment to the peptide chain. These results are well correlated with those obtained from parallel assays based on low-temperature detergent fractionation. Using the latter approach, we further demonstrate that a truly minimal l(o) domain partitioning motif [myristoylGlyCys(palmitoyl)-] can mediate efficient incorporation into the "raft" fraction of COS-7 cell membranes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it