Real-time two-dimensional asynchronous control of a computer cursor with a single subdural electrode
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of controlling a computer cursor asynchronously in two dimensions using one subdural electrode. DESIGN: Proof of concept study. SETTING: Acute care hospital in Toronto, Canada. PARTICIPANT: A 68-year-old woman with a subdural electrode implanted for the treatment of essential tremor (ET) using direct brain stimulation of the primary motor cortex (MI). INTERVENTIONS: Power changes in the electrocorticography signals were used to implement a "brain switch". To activate the switch the subject had to decrease the power in the 7-13 Hz frequency range using motor imagery of the left hand. The brain switch was connected to a system for asynchronous control of movement in two dimensions. Each time the user reduced the amplitude in the 7-13 Hz frequency band below an experimentally defined threshold the direction of cursor changed randomly. The new direction was always different from those previously rejected ensuring the convergence of the system on the desired direction. OUTCOME MEASURES: Training time, time and number of switch activations required to reach specific targets, information transfer rate. RESULTS: The user was able to control the cursor to specific targets on the screen after only 15 minutes of training. Each target was reached in 51.7 ± 40.2 seconds (mean ± SD) and after 9.4 ± 6.8 switch activations. Information transfer rate of the system was estimated to be 0.11 bit/second. CONCLUSION: A novel brain-machine interface for asynchronous two-dimensional control using one subdural electrode was developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".