The Manitoba IBD Index: Evidence for a New and Simple Indicator of IBD Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A single-item indicator of disease activity over an extended period of time, the Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Index (MIBDI), is introduced and compared against several standard measures for assessing activity in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Participants enrolled in the Manitoba IBD Cohort Study, a population-based longitudinal cohort study (N=353), were assessed semiannually by survey, clinical interview, and blood sample during a 2-year period. The MIBDI is based on patient self-reports of symptom persistence for the previous 6 months, using a 6-level response format. RESULTS: The MIBDI had good sensitivity compared with the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HB; 0.88), Powell-Tuck Index (PT; 0.84), and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ; 0.89), which was maintained at two subsequent annual measurements. Test-retest reliability was also strong (Spearman's r=0.81). Discriminant function analyses identified common discriminating variables of active disease for CD and UC that included HB, PT, and IBDQ subscales of bowel and systemic symptoms, prolonged symptom severity (e.g., abdominal and joint pain, tiredness, diarrhea), and recent persistent pain related to IBD. Unique discriminators included weight problems (CD) and blood in stool (UC). CONCLUSIONS: A single-item, patient-defined disease activity measure, the MIBDI, showed a high degree of sensitivity for classifying individuals with regard to disease status over time compared with the existing disease activity measures, and strong convergent validity with expected proxy measures of disease. These relationships remained consistent over time. Thus, the MIBDI shows promise as a valid, brief tool for measuring disease activity over an extended period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".