Motherless rats show deficits in maternal behavior towards fostered pups
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complete maternal deprivation in rats, through artificial rearing (AR), produces deficits in subsequent maternal behavior of the offspring. These deficits are partially reversed when isolated pups are provided with additional tactile stimulation designed to simulate maternal licking (e.g., Gonzalez et al. [2001] Developmental Psychobiology, 38, 11-32). These findings highlight the importance of the early maternal environment in subsequent development. However, given the possibility that prenatal environments may differ between AR and maternally reared (MR) offspring, the deficits in the behavior of AR mothers may be driven by the characteristics of their pups derived from the effects of an altered prenatal environment. Hence differences in the neonatal pups of AR mothers may produce the alterations in the AR maternal behavior. To rule out this possibility, we employed a fostering paradigm where AR and MR mothers received cross-fostered mother-reared pups. AR mothers showed the same level of deficits in maternal behavior towards MR foster pups as they do with their own pups and these deficits were partially reversed with additional tactile stimulation. Hence, maternal behavior deficits reported in mothers who had been reared in isolation are due primarily to the direct effects of the earlier experience on mechanisms regulating their maternal behavior and not to the effects on their offspring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it