MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990110708 · doi:10.1029/2004ja010590

Midnight radial profiles of the quiet and growth‐phase plasma sheet: The Geotail observations

2004· article· en· W1990110708 on OpenAlexaff
Chih‐Ping Wang, L. R. Lyons, T. Nagai, J. C. Samson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasma sheetSubstormPhysicsCurrent sheetPlasmaConvectionAtomic physicsIonMagnetic reconnectionMagnetic fieldMagnetosphereMagnetohydrodynamicsMechanicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To evaluate the plasma sheet transition from weak to strong convection, we investigate ion moments and magnetic field observed by Geotail. The Geotail data from 1995 to 1997 within the area −9 RE ≥ XGSM ≥ −30 RE and ∣YGSM∣ ≤ 5 RE were sorted for periods of quiet times and the substorm growth phase, which gives a better indication of convection strength than do global indexes. We find that the overall growth‐phase ion pressure is a factor of ∼1.55 higher than the quiet‐time ion pressure. Density is higher and temperature is lower during quiet times. Ions drift mainly earthward and duskward, and the drift speed is about twice stronger during the growth phase. The duskward drift is dominated by ions' diamagnetic drift. The ∣Bx∣ in the lobes increases strongly, while Bz near the current sheet at small radial distance decreases as convection increases, indicating that field lines become more stretched during the growth phase because of the earthward penetration of the plasma sheet. The increase in the lobe magnetic field is sufficient to maintain force balance in the z direction with the enhanced ion pressure in the plasma sheet. Intervals of negative Bz are observed during both quiet and growth‐phase conditions. The observed negative Bz intervals near the current sheet are short and are likely caused by perturbations, while those in the lobes are substantially longer and are likely associated with field line flaring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207