The suitability of anion-accelerated oxy-Cope rearrangement as a probe to study π-facial selectivity. An experimental study with (6-methyl-1-oxa-4-thiaspiro[4.5]dec-6-en-7-yl)(allyl)methanols †
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[(6-Methyl-1-oxa-4-thiaspiro[4.5]dec-6-en-7-yl)(allyl)methanols were subjected to anion-accelerated oxy-Cope rearrangement in solvents such as THF, benzene and DME to assess the π-facial selectivity caused by the acetal function. The diastereomeric pairs 17a and 17b (R = Ph) furnished the same two diastereomeric products 18a and 18b, differing only in the relative preponderance. The reaction of 17a turned from mostly syn to oxygen (18a∶18b = 1∶4) in THF to moderately syn to sulfur (18a∶18b = 2.2∶1) in DME. The reaction was completely nonselective in benzene. The effect of solvent on the reaction of 17b was even more interesting. The reaction turned from completely nonselective (18a∶18b = 1∶1) in THF to highly syn to sulfur (18a∶18b = 5.4∶1) in DME. The selectivity in benzene was somewhere in between (18a∶18b = 2.7∶1). Likewise, the reaction of 17b (R = H) turned from moderately syn to oxygen in THF (18a∶18b = 1∶2) to nearly nonselective in DME (18a∶18b = 1∶1.1). The rotation around the bond between the methanol carbon and the adjacent ring-carbon is restricted to allow rearrangement only syn to sulfur in 17a and syn to oxygen in 17b. The considerable erosion in the observed diastereoselectivity is due to a radical and/or ionic retroaldol–recombination process. The radical pathway, however, is more prevalent than the ionic alternative. The recombination favors somewhat the addition of the allyl radical to the cogenerated 7-benzoyl-6-methyl-1-oxa-4-thiaspiro[4.5]dec-6-ene on the face syn to the sulfur. As a result of such dissociation and recombination, the oxy-Cope rearrangement does not appear suitable as a probe for the study of diastereofacial selectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".