MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990118456 · doi:10.1063/1.1592291

Investigation of circular Bragg reflection in an azo polymer with photoinduced chirality

2003· article· en· W1990118456 on OpenAlexafffund
Dennis K. Hore, Yiliang Wu, Almeria Natansohn, P. Rochon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsCircular polarizationChirality (physics)OpticsMaterials scienceBragg's lawReflection (computer programming)Polarization (electrochemistry)Total internal reflectionIrradiationOptoelectronicsMolecular physicsChemistryPhysicsDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been recent interest in photoinduced chirality in azo polymers upon irradiation with circularly polarized light. The mechanism of ordering is thought to involve successive twisting of the achiral photoactive azo-containing side chains in response to the handedness of the pump polarization. In this study, a thin film of a liquid-crystalline azo polymer with a room-temperature nematic phase is irradiated with circularly polarized light and a circular Bragg reflection is observed in the absorption spectrum. When probed at normal incidence, the evolution of this selective reflection is monitored with increasing exposure. Then, the probing is carried out for various angles of incidence and the change in peak shape is studied. In the last experiment, the position of the Bragg reflection is monitored as the wavelength of the pump laser is varied. We propose that while the induced chirality is due to the circularly polarized light, the associated pitch may be large; the induced periodicity corresponding to the Bragg reflection may be the result of partial erasure due to a standing wave created by back reflection in thin films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207