MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990121844 · doi:10.1097/bpo.0b013e3181c1e2e2

Measurement of Health-related Quality of Life in Children Undergoing External Fixator Treatment for Lower Limb Deformities

2009· article· en· W1990121844 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen Montpetit, Reggie C. Hamdy, Noémi Dahan‐Oliel, Xun Zhang, Unni Narayanan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoMontreal Children's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenShriners Hospitals for Children - Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyConstruct validityDistractionRandomized controlled trialPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRange of motionPatient satisfactionSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: External fixator treatment (EFT) of lower limb deformities is expected to optimize gait and physical appearance, which might improve the child's health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although EFT can impose a significant psychologic burden on the children and their families, there is a lack of studies on the HRQOL of children undergoing EFT. The purpose of this paper is to determine the construct validity and the responsiveness of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) generic module in children with lower limb deformities undergoing EFT and to describe the use of other outcome measures in this population. METHODS: Fifty-two children (mean age: 13.0 y, SD: 4.2) who enrolled in the pilot phase of a randomized controlled trial to examine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A injections in children undergoing EFT of the lower limb were included in this study. Pain and functional mobility were measured at baseline. HRQOL was assessed with the child self-report and parent proxy-report formats of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL) at baseline, at mid-distraction, mid-consolidation, 1-week post-frame removal, and 3 months post-frame removal time points. The known groups method was used to measure the construct validity of the PedsQL; paired t tests, Cohen's d estimate of effect size (ES) and standardized response mean were used to calculate its responsiveness. RESULTS: Children and parents reported significantly lower HRQOL scores on all PedsQL domains compared with norms. ES and standardized response mean calculations both show largest amounts of change in the Physical Health domain, with children and parents reporting worse HRQOL at mid-distraction than at baseline. The PedsQL shows statistically significant changes only in the emotional functioning score of the child self-report from 3 months post-frame removal compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The PedsQL is able to discriminate HRQOL between children with leg length discrepancy and the normal population. The responsiveness of the PedsQL in children with lower limb deformities was shown through patient change over time as a result of EFT. Our findings indicate the importance of assessing a wide range of domains including physical, psychosocial, and emotional components of health in children with leg length discrepancy undergoing EFT. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Case series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric OrthopaedicsSame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207