MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990123877 · doi:10.1139/p06-088

OH spectroscopy and chemistry investigated with astronomical sky spectra

2007· article· en· W1990123877 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
P. C. Cosby, T. G. Slanger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRotational–vibrational spectroscopyPhysicsSkySpectral lineAstrophysicsPopulationIntensity (physics)SpectroscopyRotational temperatureEmission spectrumStarsWavelengthSpectral resolutionCalibrationAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study summarizes the use of a large catalog of astronomical sky spectra to study different aspects of OH spectroscopy and chemistry in the terrestrial night sky. The sky spectra are unique in that they have high spectral resolution, cover the entire visible wavelength region in one exposure, and are intensity-calibrated with respect to standard stars. The intensity calibration, in particular, allows a significant revision to the OH Meinel band intensity distribution that has been in use for 43~years and permits critical evaluation of the many available sets of OH emission coefficients. The spectra further allow the OH rovibrational population distributions to be monitored throughout many nights. The OH vibrational population distribution is found to change during the night, with the population ratio between the extreme high-v and low-v levels that we can detect, v = 9 and v = 3, varying by as much as a factor of two; the low-v levels being predominant earlier in the night. It has been common to determine the kinetic temperature of the OH emission region by assuming that it is equal to the low-J rotational temperature associated with particular OH bands, typically bands originating in the v = 6 and v = 8 levels. The present calibrated data set reveals that the rotational temperatures are significantly greater for high-v than for low-v levels, the typical difference between v = 3 and v = 8 being 15 K. Previous attempts to establish that a difference existed are consistent with our current observations, although conclusions from those earlier results were limited by relatively wide error limits. The present rovibrational population measurements, which extend to high rotational levels (J′ ≤ 25.5), also reveal that the high-J populations are largely independent of vibrational level — the high-J population in v = 3 is similar to that in v = 7.PACS Nos.: 92.60.H, 92.60.hw, 33.20.–t, 33.20.Kf, 33.70.–w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207