MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990126356 · doi:10.1190/geo2014-0377.1

Traveltime tomography of a dense wide-angle profile across Orphan Basin

2015· article· en· W1990126356 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louise Watremez, K. W. Helen Lau, M. R. Nedimović, Keith E. Louden

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyCrustStructural basinThinningSeismic tomographyBasementRiftContinental crustMantle (geology)Sedimentary basinReflection (computer programming)PaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We used first arrivals and Moho reflections from the 500-km-long Orphan Basin Wide-Angle Velocity Experiment (OBWAVE) profile with 3–5-km instrument spacing to construct a traveltime tomography section and to delineate the Moho discontinuity across the Orphan Basin. The Orphan Basin is a failed rift located offshore Newfoundland, Canada, showing thinned continental crust over an unusually wide region. We observed (1) a zone of extreme crustal thinning (<7-km-thick crust) with no evidence for mantle serpentinization, (2) basement morphology exhibiting tilted blocks linked to the crustal thinning, and (3) a thicker central crustal segment that is probably related to prerift structural inheritance. Comparison with the adjacent Jeanne d’Arc Basin to the southeast suggested the presence of a decoupling zone between the two basins accommodating the difference in extension rates. There was a good correlation between the tomographic velocities and the reflection structure derived from a coincident seismic reflection profile except in an area in which the reflection seismic data suggested the presence of a deep sedimentary basin. The velocity model computed in this work indicated that this area consists of prerift basement rather than Jurassic or older sediments. Tomographic models computed by varying the density of the recording instrument array gave insight into the relationship among the target size, the instrument spacing needed to resolve it, and the velocity model uncertainty. These results may help guide the design of future wide-angle reflection and refraction surveys across rifted structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207