The<i>fliU</i>and<i>fliV</i>genes are expressed as a single ORF in<i>Salmonella</i><i>choleraesuis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A DNA fragment carrying flagellar genes was cloned from Salmonella choleraesuis. Compared to the corresponding DNA fragment of Salmonella muenchen, this fragment contained three ORFs instead of four shown in S. muenchen. The DNA sequence data showed that there was an insertion of nucleotide C in the ORF of the S. choleraesuis fliU gene, which resulted in the disappearance of a termination codon downstream. The recombinant plasmid pFU11 containing the coding region of the fliU gene made by PCR on S. choleraesuis genomic DNA was constructed and expressed in Escherichia coli in the presence of IPTG. As expected, a 45 kDa protein band was observed on a SDS-PAGE gel, in contrast to two with each having about a half of the molecular weight. These results demonstrated that the DNA sequence encoding one protein (FliU) in S. choleraesuis corresponded to the DNA sequence encoding two proteins (FliU and FliV) in S. muenchen. The protein encoded by this single ORF might carry out the functions of two separated proteins by folding in such a way that its conformation could function like two interdependent protein subunits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".