Description of a new Eocene osteoglossid fish and additional information on †Singida jacksonoides Greenwood and Patterson, 1967 (Osteoglossomorpha), with an assessment of their phylogenetic relationships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new genus and species of osteoglossomorph fish is described from the Eocene Mahenge site in north central Tanzania. The new species is sympatric with the previously described osteoglossomorph †Singida jacksonoides, but is easily distinguished from it by the presence in the new species of teeth on the jaws and entopterygoid. The new species shares characters with the Heterotidinae, such as the two arms of the preopercle being of similar length and the posterior end of the maxilla lying on the dentary, and other characters with the Osteoglossinae (including †Phareodus), for example the enlarged pectoral fin ray and the shape of the opercular bone. New specimens of †S. jacksonoides also have been recovered from the site, providing more information on the osteology of this fish. The relationships of these two Mahenge osteoglossomorphs are assessed, with both fishes placed within the Osteoglossidae, but of uncertain position in the family. Addition of the new species to previous cladistic data sets, and the revised information for †S. jacksonoides, causes the subfamily Osteoglossinae to be nonmonophyletic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".