Practical Implications of Bifurcation and Chaos in Chemical and Biological Reaction Engineering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper concentrates on the practical implications of bifurcation and chaos on novel approaches for the production of the clean fuels: hydrogen and ethanol, and the simulation of the acetylcholine neurocycle in the brain. One problem from the field of chemical reaction engineering and two from the field of biological reaction engineering, the three problems have one thing in common: the practical implications of bifurcation and chaos. The novel approach for hydrogen production is based on a novel circulating fluidized bed catalytic membrane reformer configuration achieving, simultaneously, both autothermicity and breaking the thermodynamic barriers using different techniques (membranes and/or CO2 sequestration). The static bifurcation characteristics of the autothermic process and their implications on design and operation for maximum hydrogen yield and productivity are addressed. Experimental set-up for this novel process is being developed at University of British Columbia (UBC).The novel approach for the ethanol production does not use a novel configuration, however it uses a classical configuration but with a novel mode of operation. A CSTR fermenter is used exploiting bifurcation and chaos theories to maximize ethanol yield and productivity. The sequence of research work consisted of: developing a reliable and relatively simple model to describe the fermentation process, verification of the model against experimental results, using the model in an extensive bifurcation and chaos analysis investigation to identify the regions of bifurcation and chaos and their characteristics. This is followed by using these results to guide an experimental investigation of bifurcation and chaos and their implications on improving ethanol yield and productivity.This paper also introduces our preliminary efforts to investigate the bifurcation and chaotic behavior of acetylcholine neurocycle in the brain using diffusion-reaction models in order to gain some insight into their possible connection to Alzheimer and Parkinson Diseases (AD/PD).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".